Critical Metaphor Analysis of the White Paper “Fighting COVID-19: China in Action” From the Perspective of Conceptual Blending Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1602.29Keywords:
government white paper, ideology, national image, critical discourse analysis, conceptual blending theoryAbstract
COVID-19 has been one of the most threatening infectious diseases in recent years, and China, the epicenter of this epidemic, has suffered a national image crisis, which calls for urgent actions to achieve self-image construction. The government’s white paper, the window of national ideology, is essential in constructing a national image. In this context, the study aims to conduct an ideological exploration of the white paper “Fighting COVID-19: China in Action”. The study relies on conceptual blending theory and van Dijk’s theory of ideology to develop a theoretical research framework to explore the process of ideological construction of metaphorical structures in the blended space. This study comes to the following three conclusions: (1) metaphorical structures in the blended space try to explain China’s actions to the public and arouse sympathy to persuade readers; (2) conceptual metaphors in this white paper reveal major ideologies: “collectivism,” and “people-oriented value”; (3) these ideologies aim to construct a positive national image: a country willing to take responsibilities and cooperate with the world. In conclusion, conceptual blending theory could provide a valuable apparatus for micro-level study in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), enhancing people’s understanding of conceptual metaphors’ functions in ideological construction.
References
Ahrens, K. (2009). Analysing conceptual metaphors in political language. In Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 1-5). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Aronczyk, M. (2007). New and improved nations: Branding national identity. In Practicing culture (pp. 115–138). Routledge.
Avraham, E. (2020). Nation branding and marketing strategies for combating tourism crises and stereotypes toward destinations. Journal of Business Research, 116, 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.036
Barnett, M. (2013). Humanitarian governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012512-083711
Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y. R. (2007). Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
Chen, H., Zhu, Z., Qi, F., Ye, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, M., & Jin, J. (2020). Country image in COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of China. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2020.3023459
Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks and London: Sage Publications.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–138). Sage.
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction (1st ed) (pp. 258–284), London: Sage.
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 113-130). Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive science, 22(2), 133-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-X
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Recherches en communication, 19, 57-86.
Feng, Z. B. & Liu, Z, Q. (2022). English translation of war metaphors in publicity discourse of COVID-19 prevention and control: A case study of “Fighting COVID-19: China in action”, Journal of Weinan Normal University, 1, 68-73.
Flowerdew, J., & Leong, S. (2007). Metaphors in the discursive construction of patriotism: the case of Hong Kong’s constitutional reform debate. Discourse & Society, 18(3), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507075476
Geis, M. L. (2012). The language of politics. Springer Science & Business Media.
Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The American Academy of Political and Social Science annals, 616(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142
Gover, A. R., Harper, S. B., & Langton, L. (2020). Anti‐Asian hate crime during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Exploring the reproduction of inequality. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09545-1
Gu, C. & Tipton, R. (2020). (Re-) Voicing Beijing’s discourse through self-referentiality: A corpus-based CDA analysis of government interpreters’ Discursive mediation at China’s political press conferences (1998–2017). Perspectives, 28(3), 406-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2020.1717558
Hart, C. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies, 5(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990058
Horton, W. S. (2013). Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.797735
Hirono, M. (2013). Three legacies of humanitarianism in China. Disasters, 37(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12022
Hu, K., & Li, X. (2022). The image of the Chinese government in the English translations of Report on the Work of the Government: a corpus-based study. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 9(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23306343.2022.2066814
Koller, V. (2014). Cognitive linguistics and ideology. In J. R. Taylor and J. Littlemore (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 234–252). Bloomsbury.
Kress, G. & Hodge, R. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kress, G. (1985). Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2020). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. In S. D. Sarasvathy, N. Dew and S. Venkataraman (Eds.), Shaping entrepreneurship research (pp. 475–504). Routledge.
Liu, Z., & Liu, H. (2021). The Construction of China’s National Image From Transitivity Perspective—A Case Study of “Fighting COVID-19: China in Action”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(11), 1421-1427. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1111.09
McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. England: Polity Press.
Mu, J., Zhao, H., & Yang, G. (2021). A critical discourse analysis of reports about China on the COVID-19 pandemic in The New York Times. Open Access Library Journal, 8(8), 1–16. https://doi: 10.4236/oalib.1107746
Onnis, B. (2022). COVID-19 and China’s global image. Asia Maior, (2), 73-87.
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher education for the future, 8(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Pietrzak-Franger, M., Lange, A., & Söregi, R. (2022). Narrating the pandemic: COVID-19, China and blame allocation strategies in Western European popular press. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(5), 1286-1306. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494221077291
Nye, J. S. (2023). Soft Power and Great-Power Competition: Shifting Sands in the Balance of Power Between the United States and China. Springer Nature Singapore.
Rubin, D. I., & Wilson, F. A. (2021). Blame China: Trump and anti-Asian sentiment during COVID-19. In A Time of Covidiocy: Media, Politics, and Social Upheaval (pp. 10-31). Brill.
Steenkamp, J. B. (2021). Building strong nation brands. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2019-0253
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J., Kaal, A. & Krennmayr, T. (2010). Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 765-796. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.024
Stock, F. (2009). Identity, image, and brand: A conceptual framework. Place branding and public diplomacy, 5, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2009.2
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Political discourse and political cognition. In C. Schäffne & P, Chilton (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 203-237), Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffne & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language & peace. (pp. 17-33). Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Ideology and discourse analysis. In M. Freeden (Ed.), The Meaning of Ideology (pp. 110-135). Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2017). Socio-cognitive discourse studies. In J. Flowerdew and J Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 26-43). Routledge.
Wang, H., & Ge, Y. (2020). Negotiating national identities in conflict situations: The Discursive reproduction of the Sino-U.S. trade war in China’s news reports. Discourse & Communication, 14(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319893406
Wang, J. (2017). Representing Chinese nationalism/patriotism through president Xi Jinping’s “Chinese dream” discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(6), 830-848. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16028.wan
Wasti, S. A. (2003). Organizational commitment, turnover intentions and the influence of cultural values. Journal of Occupational and organizational Psychology, 76(3), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647193
Wodak, R. (2009). Discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R., De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., and Liebhart, K. (2009). The Discursive Construction of National Identities (2nd rev. ed). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R. (2002). Fragmented identities. In P. Chilton, C. Schäffner, Politics as Text and Talk (pp. 143-169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. In R. Wodak (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to English Studies (pp. 302–316). Routledge.
Woolard, K. A. (2020). Language ideology. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic anthropology, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0217
Wilson, J. (2015). Political discourse. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Xin, H. J.& Yan, W.C. (2022). Enlightenment of Relevance Theory in Metaphor Translation of “Fighting Covid-19: China in Action”, Journal of Ningbo University, 4, 79-84.
Xue, Y., & Xu, Q. (2021). An ecological discourse analysis of news coverage of COVID-19 in China in The Times and The New York Times. Journal of World Languages, 7(1), 80-103. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0005
Yang, S., Isa, S. M., & Ramayah, T. (2022). How are destination image and travel intention influenced by misleading media coverage? Consequences of COVID-19 outbreak in China. Vision, 26(1), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262921993245
Yang, Y. E., Keller, J. W., & Molnar, J. (2018). An Operational Code Analysis of China’s National Defense White Papers: 1998-2015. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 23, 585-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-017-9524-5
Zhang, J. (2012). China’s Defense White Papers: a critical appraisal. Journal of Contemporary China, 21(77), 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.684969
