Gender-Based Lexical Perceptions in Saudi EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1602.32Keywords:
gender-based differences, lexical perception, productive vocabulary, Saudi EFL learners, vocabulary useAbstract
This study investigates gender-based differences in English vocabulary perception and production among Saudi EFL learners. Using a mixed-methods approach, it involved 80 participants (male and female) aged 18–55 and examined three areas: 1) gender differences in vocabulary perception, 2) variations in vocabulary production, and 3) patterns in vocabulary choices. Unlike prior research, this study found no significant gender differences in vocabulary perception or lexical variation. Participants of both genders demonstrated awareness of accents and dialects, highlighting the importance of adapting to evolving vocabulary. In vocabulary production, both males and females exhibited similar tendencies in intentional word selection and context-based adaptations. Although some studies suggest subtle gender differences, this research aligns with findings that gender-gap diversity may reduce such distinctions. Both genders expressed positive attitudes toward lexical variation, recognizing its value in enriching vocabulary and enhancing proficiency. Participants also showed familiarity with idiomatic expressions, informal language, technical terms, figurative language, and metaphors. Overall, the study contributes to sociolinguistics by addressing how gender-based language variation influences identity. It emphasizes that factors like education and social context may override traditional gender differences in language use. The findings encourage a focus on shared linguistic patterns rather than perceived gender disparities. Future research could explore metaphor comprehension and verbal fluency, examining links to cognitive abilities such as fluid intelligence. This study provides a comprehensive view of gender influences on vocabulary preferences and usage, offering valuable insights for sociolinguistics and second language acquisition research.
References
Afzal, N. (2019). A study on vocabulary-learning problems encountered by BA English majors at the university level of education. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 81–98. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.6
Aldeaij, G. A. (2020). Proficiency and vocabulary levels of Saudi EFL teachers: Using a vocabulary levels test [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of King Saud.
Alharbi, J. M. (2021). Vocabulary knowledge Among English Majors in a Saudi Arabia University. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 24, 769- 784.
Alhaysony, M. (2017). Language learning strategies use by Saudi EFL students: The effect of duration of English language study and gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(1), 18–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0701.03
Allal-Sumoto, T. K., Miyoshi, K., & Mizuhara, H. (2023). The effect of productive vocabulary knowledge on second language comprehension. Frontier Psychology, 14(1), 1–9. https://10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049885
Alqarni, I. (2018). Receptive vocabulary size of male and female Saudi English major graduates. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 111–119. https://10.5539/ijel.v9n1p111
AlShammari, S. (2020). EFL vocabulary learning strategies used by Saudi Arabia university students. Advanced Education, 16, 28–38. https://10.20535/2410-8286.202436
Alsharif, R. (2022). Relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size: Evidence from Saudi female EFL learners. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 10(1), 188–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.1p.188
Alshumrani, H. A., & Al-Ahmadi, N. M. (2022). The representation of vocabulary knowledge aspects in Saudi EFL textbooks. Arab World English Journal, 13(4), 325–340. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.21
Altman, C., Goldstein, T., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2018). Vocabulary, metalinguistic awareness and language dominance among bilingual preschool children. Frontiers in Psychology, 1953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01953.
Ankawi, A. (2022). Academic Vocabulary Acquisition Difficulties for Saudi Postgraduate Students in New Zealand Universities, English Language Teaching, Vol. 15, No. 9, pp.138-150. https://10.5539/elt.v15n9p138
Bialystok, E., Peets, K. F., & Moreno, S. (2014). Producing bilinguals through immersion education: Development of metalinguistic awareness. Applied. Psycholinguistics, 35,177–191.
Belahcen, A., & Ouahmiche, G. (2017). An investigation of language variation and change among three age-groups: A case study. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(3–1), 24–35. https://10.11648/j.ijll.s.2017050301.14
Benedek, M., Beaty, R., Jauk, E., Koschutnig, K., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., ... & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Creating metaphors: The neural basis of figurative language production. NeuroImage, 90, 99–106.
Bhatti, M., & Mukhtar, R. (2020). Impact of vocabulary learning strategies on gender-based ESL learners in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 2(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v2i3.4603.
Canga Alonso, A., & Arribas García, M. (2014). Productive vocabulary knowledge of Spanish EFL learners. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 1, 39–56.
Daif-Allah, A. S., & Aljumah, F. H. (2020). Differences in Motivation to Learning English among Saudi University Students. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 63-74.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford university press.
Fleckenstein, L. M. (2018). English vocabulary knowledge at the end of compulsory education in Iceland [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Iceland.
Hasanah, L., Pradina, S., Hadita, A., & Putri, W. C. (2019). Sociolinguistic influence in the use of English as a second language (ESL) classroom: Seeing from Onovughe’s (2012) perspective. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 1(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v1i1.2538
Johnston, & Schembri. (2007). Australian Sign Language: An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khan, R., Radzuan, R., Shahbaz, M., Ibrahim, A., Khan, M. (2018). The role of vocabulary knowledge in speaking development of Saudi EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 406–418. https://110.31235/osf.io/68gwj.
Kobayashi, K., & Little A. (2022). Gender differences in the effects of explicit vocabulary learning strategies training. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 23–51.
Lei, Y., & Reynolds, B. L. (2022). Learning English vocabulary from word cards: A research synthesis. Frontier Psychology, 13. https://10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984211
Li, X. (2022). Gender differences and discrimination in lexicon. Advances in social science. Education and Humanities Research, 673. https://10.2991/assehr.k.220706.117
Maulina, M. (2018). Gender differences in language development, acquisition, comprehension, and production. Proceeding of the 65th TEFLIN International Conference, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/tdxzu
Mohammed, A., & Alwadai, M. (2019). Evaluating Saudi EFL secondary schools students' performance on Paul Nation's Standardized Vocabulary Level Tests. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(5), 487–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0905.01
Moreno Espinosa, S. (2010). Boys’ and girls’ L2 word associations. In R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Ed.), Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages (pp. 139–163). Palgrave Macmillan.
Montero-SaizAja, A. (2021). Gender-based differences in EFL learners' language learning strategies and productive vocabulary. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 7, 83–107.
Omar, A. (2018). Exploring gender usage and adaptations of English loanwords in Saudi colloquial Arabic. Hermes, 7(3), 171–215. https://10.21608/HERMS.2018.71679
Oviogun, P. V., & Veerdee, P. S. (2020). Definition of language and linguistics: Basic competence. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21744/mami.v1n1.1
Piersoul, J., & Van de Velde, F. (2023). Men use more complex language than women, but the difference has decreased over time: A study on 120 years of written Dutch. Linguistics, 61(3), 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0022
Prahba, C., & Raja, W. (2021). Gender differences in English language acquisition. Annals of the Romanian Society of Cell Biology, 25(5), 3914–3917. DOI. 10.47255/f8aa1v48.
San Mateo-Valdehíta, A., & Criado de Diego, C. (2021). Receptive and productive vocabulary acquisition: Effectiveness of three types of tasks. Results from French students of Spanish as second language. Onomázein, (51), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.51.05
Suliman, A. A. K. (2021). Vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL Saudi students in the United States [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Andrews University. https://dx.doi.org/10.32597/dissertations/1761/
Susilawati, E. (2020). The inclusion of sociolinguistic context in the text materials of English text books for junior high school. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i2.485
Tomassini, C. (2021). Gender gaps in science: Systematic review of the main explanations and research agenda. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), (22), 13- 25. DOI: 10.14201/eks.25437.
Wang, J., Jin, G., & Li, W. (2023). Changing perceptions of language in sociolinguistics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(91). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01574
Wanjiku, N. F. (2018). Lexical variation and change in the Northern Dialect of Gĩkũyũ Language [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Nairobi.
Wallentin, M. (2020). Gender differences in language are small but matter for disorders. In M. J. Aminoff, F. Boller, & D. E. Swaab (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 175, pp. 81–102). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64123-6.00007-2
Wucherer, B. V., & Reiterer, S. M. (2018). Language is a girlie thing, isn't it? A psycholinguistic exploration of the L2 gender gap. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 118–134.
